Page Header

An Evaluation of Indicators of Railway Intelligent Transportation Systems using the Group Analytic Hierarchy Process

Evelin Krmac, Boban Djordjević


Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) have a significant and promising role in the overall improvement of transport performances. However, in the absence of a set of key performance indicators (KPI), it is very difficult to evaluate ITS and the effects of their application objectively. Therefore, the first aim of the paper is to develop an appropriate KPIs for assessment of railway ITS and the monitoring of their impacts. Based on that, a tool for the evaluation of the importance of these indicators is proposed. For that purpose a set of twenty-four indicators was grouped by topics under the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The paper thoroughly describes their development and classification. An evaluation of indicators based on expert opinions via the Group Analytic Hierarchy Process (GAHP) method is presented. Results obtained by the GAHP method illustrate the importance or significance of indicators for railway ITS.


Railway; Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS); key performance indicators; Evaluation; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Full Text:



Zandi F, Tavana M. An Optimal Investment Scheduling Framework for Intelligent Transportation Systems Architecture. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 15(3): 115-132.

Kolosz B, Grant-Muller S, Djemame K. Modelling uncertainty in the sustainability of Intelligent Transport Systems for highways using probabilistic data fusion. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2013, 49: 78-97.

Ning B, Tang T, Yan F, Wang F-Y, Zeng D. Intelligent Railway Systems in China. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2006, 21(5): 80-83.

Jianwei H, Zhenxiang Z, Zhiheng L. Benefit Evaluation Framework of Intelligent Transportation Systems. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(1): 81-87.

Zhicai J, Jianping W, McDonald M. Socio-Economic Impact Assessment of Intelligent Transport Systems. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2006, 11(3): 339-350.

Djordjevic B, Krmac E. Key Performance Indicators for Measuring the Impects of ITS on transport. International Symposium on Electronics in Transport-ISEP 2016. Ljubljana, Slovenija.

Saaty TL. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP (2nd edition ed.). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. 2000.

Tavana M, Hatami-Marbini A. A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38: 13588–13603.

Levine J, Underwood SE. A Multiattribute Analysis of Goals for Intelligent Transportation System Planning. Transportation Research Part C, 1996, 4(2): 97-111.

Kolosz BW, Grant-Muller SM, Djemame K. A Macroscopic Forecasting Framework for Estimating Socioeconomic and Environmental Performance of Intelligent Transport Highways. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(2).

De Brucker K, Macharis C, Verbeke A. Two-stage multi-criteria analysis and the future of intelligent transport systems-based safety innovation projects. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2015, 9(9): 842-850.

Mardani A, Zavadskas KE, Khalifah Z, Jusoh A, Nor DK. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Transport, 2016: 31(3): 359-385 .

Mandic D, Jovanovic P, Bugarinovic M. Two-phase model for multi-criteria project ranking: Serbian Railways case study . Transport Policy, 2014, 36: 88-104.

Gercek H, Karpak B, Kilincaslan T. A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul. Transportation, 2004,31(2): 203-228.

Krmac E, Djordjević B. An Evaluation of Train Control Information Systems for Sustainable Railways using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. European Transportation Research Review, 2017, 9-35.

Mahmod M, Jonkers E, Klunder GA, Benz T, Winder A. Amitran methodology framework for evaluating the impact of information and communicationtechnology-based measures on CO2 emissions in the transport field. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2015, 9(4): 418-428.

Beck A, Bente H., Schilling M. Railway efficiency: An overview and a look at opportunities for improvement. 2013. Paris: OECD/International Transport Forum.

Mitsakis E, Iordanopoulos P, Mintsis E, Mamarikas S, Aifadopoulou G. Intelligent Transport Systems Deployment in Thessaloniki: Assessment of Costs and Benefits. SPATIUM(33), 2015, 26-32.

Jiménez-Redondo N, Escriba Marín S, García Benítez F, Cáceres N. Automated and cost effective railway infrastructure maintenance. 2013. ACEM-Rail.

Mitwallyova H, Jankovic V. The influence of railway infrastructure on the live in selected european countries. International Journal of Business and Management, 2015, 3(2).

Song B-Y, Moon D-S, Lee HS. Development of the Assessment Indicators for Railway Safety. International Journal of Railway, 2012, 5(4).

Tordai L. Common Safety Indicators and Common Safety Targets of European Railways. n.d. Paris: UIC.

Ahrens J, Dogs J, Kupke D, Sagevik, M. UIC reporting guideline sustainable mobility and transport: Reporting Principles and Indicators for Rail. 2011. UIC International Union of Railways.

Kaparias I, Bell GM. Key Performance Indicators for traffic management and Intelligent Transport Systems. 2011. CONDUITS, Coordination Of Network Descriptors for Urban Intelligent Transport Systems.

Khorasani G, Tatari A, Yadollahi A, Rahimi M. Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System in Road Safety. International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences, 2013, 1(1).

Kostiainen J. Impact of ITS Measures Towards Reaching Emissions Targets. Transport Sustainability and Environment. (n.d.).

Canaud M., El Faouzi N-E. ECOSTAND: towards a standard methodology for environmental evaluation of ITS. Transportation Research Procedia, 2015, 6: 377-390.

Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill. 1980.

Al-Atawi A M, Kumar R, Saleh W. Transportation sustainability index for Tabuk city in Saudi Arabia: an analytic hierarchy process. Transport, 2016, 31(1): 47-55.

Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z, Blagojevic B, Suvocarev K. A two-phase algorithm for consensus building in AHP-group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37: 6670-6682.

Podvezko V. Application of AHP technique. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2009, 10(2): 181-189.

Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K.M. Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, 19: 19-27.

Saaty TL. Decision making - the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004, 13(1): 1-35.

Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1): 83-98.

Oztaysi B. A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: The case of content management systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 70: 44-54.

Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jimenez J.M., Salvador M. A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 182: 367-382.

Taha H. Operations research. An introduction. 1997. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z. Synthesis of individual best local priority in AHP-group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13: 2045-2056.

Ramanathan R. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 63: 27-35.

Huang Y-S, Liao J-T, Lin Z-L. A study on Aggregation of group decisions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2009, 26: 445-454.

Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong W-C, Xu Y. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49: 281-289.

Forman E, Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 108: 165-169.

Grošelj P, Zadnik Stirn L, Ayrilmis N, Kitek Kuzman M. Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42: 2198–2204.

Saaty TL. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. 2001.

Bernasconi M, Choirat C., Seri R. Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 232: 584-592.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Evelin Krmac, Boban Djordjević

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.